Frequency of Change – Or Change of Frequency?

“If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration.”― Nikola Tesla

Do we feel our soul and do we understand how it encompasses and permeates us? Is speech more of a physical or spiritual activity? When we speak we are utilizing various components of our physicality, from our lungs, our mouth numerous other physical components. But the words we say are not just vibrations effecting the displacement of air. Our words are expressions of our ideas.

Without ideas there would perhaps be no state of existence. We are primarily our mind. The mind supervenes the brain. The brain process ideas and in turn we communicate these ideas to other people through speech and by writing, among other modalities.

When we speak we bring out our soul into the world. This in turn shapes the world and develops it. Our ideas and our speech surely have the greatest ability to effect change in the world. Is this process influential because we live in more of a spiritual reality than a physical one?

Before we dismiss this postulation, let us consider that we know that all matter is composed of molecules or on more focused level of quarks – particles carrying an electrical charge. Electricity is a channeled form of energy. We are likewise channels or vessels for the channeled energy of our soul.

Phenomenology Continued

The gateway to the light is a direct path.  Along the journey there are many distractions and distortions to confuse ones otherwise clearly guided voyage. For one has an enormous stream of energy and there are the extraneous forces that want to absorb some of the energy. In order to grasp the energy they strive to take one off course, bit by bit.

The energy is never lost or fully absorbed, it is only an illusion. One can resume course and regain the seemingly possessed energy. One only needs strive to return towards the light and embrace it fully. For one can only move on one path at a time and one can be harnessed by one rider at a time. The rider must be The Light. For light moves at the fastest speed possible, while with the greatest measurable precision.

To avoid distractions on the journey, one needs to shield oneself, by engulfing oneself in light through a modified channel. Blinding as it might seem to any observer, one who is encapsulated within the light can see with extreme clarity and focus. Dispensing bits of the light, to those who can see none of their own, acts to refine one’s own light. For the shared light constantly returns to the one who initially shared it, through the vessels of transference. The light was initially shared from the initial source. Therefore it constantly returns to and is dispensed from that source – all the while redistributing of itself, to all possible recipients.

The light shines as a countenance upon the face and is focused through the eyes. In every direction it shines and is equally viewed, while not necessarily perceived. Into the mirror of the construct, the light shines. It reflected infinitely within and without. There is no possible increase or decrease of the light. Instead it is flows through the vessels and within oneself.

Observations in The Prosecutors Office (Poem)

Observing the law in action, trying to contain my reaction,

Could not believe the explanations I heard, bizarre and absurd,

Before the courts defendants arguing torts when charged with Provincial Offences,

Some defendants were ordered to mend fences, remedy infractions of a by-law,

I could not believe what I saw,

Fines imposed, indiscretions exposed, guilty pleas and abstainees,

Explanations, hesitations, regurgitations, exaggerations and inconsistencies,

In the court, codes for behaviour, stories to savour,

Law in motion, focused notion,

Various characters, with accents abound, no humour permitted all around,

With wisdom and reason arguments were made, and defendants without a defence quickly paid,

Speeding, not heeding signs and getting in binds, among the charges before the court,

Summaries made in short, some accused thought the court heard matters of tort,

So much I learnt, about manners, pleasantries and respect,

Attire, from shirts to shoes and pants one must not neglect,

For ones appearance sets the stage for ones image and could perhaps affect the notes on the page,

Charges reduced and withdrawn, some drivers were speeding awhile before dawn,

Cars crashed, defendants smashed, excuses abash, heartfelt stories and payments of cash,

Lessons learnt, defendants scurnt, and new directions committed,

Promises made, fees paid and surcharges abound,

For even smiles sometimes create a sound, Restrain your laugh here there is no gaffe!



Thought Processes Postulations

Is it possible to have more than one thought at a time? To be able to walk and chew gum at the same time is an interesting capability. To be able to rub ones belly and pat ones head simultaneously are considered by some to be rare accomplishments. But are these activities actually more than one thought at a time?

Automatic or innate physical capacity for synchronic movements might operate from an unconscious part of the brain that permits for seemingly natural dexterity. These processes are not necessarily what we will term as thoughts. Instead, thoughts will be defined as actively conscious ideas. These cognitions are only possible one at a time or one at any one instant.

Having established that only one thought is possible at any one instant, we now investigate if this process can be modified. Perception of the five senses of sight, sound, smell, taste and touch are also possible one at a time. But what if sound was introduced into ear – into the sense of sound – at the same instant as a thought as being processed? Would this dual introduction of two inputs overload the brain?

For that matter would the effort to actually experience more than one of the sensory perceptions at any one moment change the way the brain perceives of the sensations of these senses? Are the sensory experiences perceived by the brain or projected from the brain outwards in the world and into ones physical being? Does one actually feel their sensations from their sensory experience or is all experience mental; occurring solely within the brain itself?

Humor Is it Funny?

Jokes are funny. Cynicism can be moderately humorous too! But what makes us laugh at humor? Perhaps we have a desire to laugh – we only need a reason. With less face-to-face communication, we appreciate any sense of humor, in which we can delight. Smiling faces and smiley faces of all varieties, with winks and kisses are all the buzz online and on your communication device. But perhaps, all of this texting / messaging, binging, pinging and other ”–inging” is preventing clear communication. So any opportunity to smile face-to-face, with others, is surely a welcomed opportunity. A good joke is the best way to start the day, or at anytime.

But what is it about good joke that causes us to chuckle or laugh? Is it the timing of the joke?  Is it the  delivery, or the concluding phrase, which makes us smirk, smile or feel an internal tickle that will likely result in laughter?

Maybe our response to the humor-gaining methods is related our mood. Or maybe, our response to the stimulus – the comedian telling anecdotes or jokes – depends on the wit and sass of the comic. Why is it that some comedians start of their bit by insulting the audience? Is this so that whatever they say next, will be perceived as better than initial insult and thereby be considered funny?

Do the comedian’s jokes even need too be funny? Some comics use swearing, cursing, mocking and negative statements and phrases to get a laugh from the audience. Do these comics deliver their bit in this way, because they believe that the audience is desperate to release stress and tension? Needing a good laugh so dearly, that just about anything the comedian says will generate at least a smirk? Can a smile bring about laughter?

What about Laughter Yoga? This is a fun method – if I am correct in my understanding – where a group of people sit in a circle, and smile at one another, until they all begin to laugh. No jokes, puns, innuendos, insults, negativity or any other “silly stuff”. But all of the group members eventually begin to laugh, and share in the collective fun, without a word being uttered.

Speaking of group laughter, what about improvisational comedy skits, with role-playing. This is great spontaneous fun? What about Theatre Sports for engaging humor? In this system of interactive comedy, the audience members are invited to participate in the skit. But each chosen participant will need to improvise their role and their lines? Surely, this is great fun. In this method, the audience members are  creating the laughing process for themselves while having great fun. Funny stuff : )

How to Think

Recently I was speaking with my friend about thinking. It might seem like a strange topic and slightly odd. But, even while not being an official Philosopher, I felt I could contribute to this discussion in a thoughtful way.

I had just completed reading a book specifically about thinking. Having read this book numerous times, I am slowly beginning to understand how to think. Is it an obvious process that everyone knows how to postulate an idea and then they consider that they have thought? Not exactly correct. On the average, it might seem that thought processes begin through the pursuit of knowledge. Then, once one has attained that knowledge, one will make an effort to understand the knowledge and thereby possibly come to understand the knowledge. Then one will gain wisdom from having the understanding of the knowledge and use this wisdom to learn and grow through acquiring additional knowledge.  This is one possible method for thinking.

But there is another perspective on the thinking process and its development. What if we first suppose that one should first focus on refining our faculty of thought and our thinking processes? Then having achieved this goal, we will we strive to develop wisdom and refine our faculty of thought. Through having developed our ability to develop wisdom and having refined our faculty of thought, we will come to understand our own process of thinking and realize how we acquire knowledge within our brain and within our being. Thereafter we can now strive to acquire knowledge and be able to utilize the knowledge practically.

There is clearly an Internet and it seems to be a vast database of inter-connected systems (servers & ports), housing and referring massive amount of information (data) and routing it to various search engines. Is it a bizarre postulation that perhaps the real Internet is really the world as a whole in which we exist? That perhaps we are the portals, servers connected to various ports, comprising a network and receiving and distributing data to the world through our very existence. Just through our perceiving, processing, thinking, refining, developing & redistributing data we are being shaped and shaping the construct – the world.

It is not so important what we search for on the internet or what great information it contains. It is of greatest importance how we interact with the data; and simultaneously are the data, which powers the construct of which we are simultaneously composed.

Based in part of the works of Schneur Zalman, of Liadi – The TANYA – Through My Continuous Reading of this Great Work I Have Come to Think Differently.

Speculative Cynic

Let us ponder collective intentionality, and the power of effectiveness; for causative change, in a revealed domain. Let us postulate an integrated system that operates with precise synchronicity and spans the entire construct on levels. Let us further query into the interconnectedness of mind, collective unconscious and the wisdom that is the bridge which joins these modes. Finally, let us delve into the ability to perceive with clarity through the screens of fabrication and concealment that morph, distort and convolute the oneness into multiplicity.

Collective intentionality has the power to shape reality and to effect change through causation, only within a revealed domain. For intentionality defines the shape and structure of reality. Through an agreement the perceived and perceivable are able to be viewed. The colors, voids, defined terms and modes of expression exist through the collective intentional agreement. Perception with the domain is variably different from perceptiveness beyond it. For at each level the domain is invariably modified in a state of flux.  Through the flux change there is the potential for change through a joint intentionality of the collective whole.

The integrated system that operates with precise synchronicity and spans the entire construct on all levels is the modality which is imbedded within level of the ultimate construct, within which all of the levels are contained. The possibility for integration of the system and its operation of synchronicity is possible through the collective intentionality as whole, without any division. A perceived division is subjective, but does not exist for the objective perspective, except as an illusion of mind.

A query into the interconnectedness of Mind, collective unconscious and the wisdom that is the bridge, which joins these modes will provide for enlightenment of the obscured. The interconnectedness of Mind is facilitated through wisdom. The sharing of wisdom through a joint modality provides for illumination for the collective unconscious and the spanned Mind which is interconnected among all members who connect to the portal of the modality through the level of wisdom which has been defined. A definition for the modality of the wisdom required at the precise level for integration was established at the joining of the collective interconnected Mind and exists in a defined state within the construct. But beyond the construct into various levels it exists in a state of flux that is shaped by the members as permitted within the defined parameters for morphing.

The ability to perceive with clarity through the screens of fabrication and concealment that morph, distort and convolute the oneness into multiplicity is the specific goal. This process can be commenced upon through removing the screens of fabrication by focusing the graspable levels of light and focusing the light with high intensity into opaque screens. This will provide for enhanced perception and conversion of the screens into portals and vessels for further encapsulation of the light. In the absence of the focused light perception is convoluted to the point of abstraction. Through the obscuration of the light there is initiated a process morphing and distortion.



Parting of the Red Sea

Did you ever hear the story about the Red Sea splitting in the Bible? Some people claim that it was really the Reed Sea or some other waterway. Regardless of your belief on where the event occurred, let us look at the lessons to learnt from the narrative of the story.

The Hebrews were enslaved by the ancient Egyptians. Even though there is no logical reason why the Egyptian empire, which at that time was the leading society of the time, would need slaves, the Biblical record states that this was the case, so will we not discuss the why here. We could, however, inquire as to the why? If Egypt was already built, then what was really to be built? The so-called storage cities were constructed to store the somewhat scarce supply of wheat during the times of famine. Once these storage silos were made the need for a workforce in of foreigners in Egypt would be to be supplementary to the peasants who were already conscripted to work for Pharoh. There must have been some cultural or social reason why Pharoh wanted to have the Hebrews stay in Egypt.

When the time came for the Hebrews to finally leave Egypt they left by way of the Red or Reed Sea. To cross the Sea they needed it to split or part so that they could journey through it to evade recapture by the Egyptians. There needed to be a contract with the Sea to ensure it would split when so needed by the Hebrews.

The stipulation with the sea was necessary to ensure that the sea would reach an exalted state; by having a purpose and fulfilling it when obligated to do so. The contract creates the condition for its existence, at the time of its creation and for its continued being and recreation, at every moment.

This is similar to a student who is commanded to do something, whether or not the student believes it to be within his ability he fulfills the order. His fulfillment gives him strength, which is far greater than he had before, because he has pushed himself beyond his perceived abilities. Similarly, a bodybuilder lifts weights, which cause his muscles to tear, thereafter his muscles will rebuild themselves to be much stronger than before the workout. This demonstrates that one gains strength by challenging one’s natural state of being and can do so continuously.

The lesson I took from this sicha (talk) is that one can only be said to have every existed, if one strove to be the best one could have been, by going beyond one’s set potential to achieve one’s personal greatness.

Perceived Reality

How much of your perceived reality is real versus the degree of imagined fiction in your life? 

Does the way you conceive of your world effect the way the world interacts with you? Are your thoughts and beliefs about people accurate? Perhaps what we believe to be true about others is partially correct. The remaining part of the real nature and behavior of others is possibly dependent on our relationship with them. 

People are different to various people. The variation of others is related to the relationship that they have with us. Each person may seem different to every other person with whom they interact. Bill is not the same person to Tom that he is to Jane. Bill is always Bill in who he is as a person and as a man. But Bill is different in each relationship with everyone he knows. 

This theory begs the question: Is who one is dependent on who people believe one to be in reality? Is one a construct of many other people’s perceptions and projections of them? If one changes one’s friends, then does one become a new person? Perhaps this is a possibility.

The Bible claims that: ‘Wisdom is found in the company of the wise’ and ‘Folly is found amongst fools’. Also ‘Poverty is found among the poor’ and ‘Wealth found among the wealthy’. Does mere association with a group of people determine one’s position as a wise or wealthy person? Perhaps one’s mindset and thought process will change when immersed in a group of wise or rich people so that their behaviors and thinking processes spread to other members of the group. If this correct, then is wisdom a mindset or is it a phenomenon that rests upon certain individuals at certain times. 

If mere association with a group mentality enriches one’s standing in reality, then by reading about wise or rich people should likewise enhance oneself to some degree. If joining group of wise or wealthy people makes one gain wisdom and wealth, then one should join every Meetup group for wise or rich people and in a short or long time one will join their ranks and become wise or wealthy. 

The same result could be achieved for health and fitness. One could become more healthy and fit by becoming friends with and hanging out with healthy and fit people. Eventually one would begin to emulate behaviors related to health and fitness and enrich ones overall wellness.

Thus Spoke John Galt

Thus Spoke John Galt

In the book Atlas Shrugged, whenever an idea, thought or statement seemed so bizarre that it could not be explained, a reference was made; being: “Who is John Galt?” Herein this article the reference will be used in the same manner.

Thus spoke John Galt:

  • Why when people are carded on the street they are asked for identification; instead of being given a card that contains useful information on resources, such as; shelters, legal advice, medical clinics, social service agency contacts?
  • Why is money spent on slandering candidates, during election periods, rather than on allocating the much needed funds to help people in need?
  • Why are matters of no importance the main focus during election campaigns, as means of detracting attention from real issues?
  • Politicians speak confidently and loudly about matters of no substance and softly about important issues.
  • Why is money spent on promoting causes to help the poor, rather than money actually being given to the poor?
  • Why are there rules in condominiums that everyone must follow, which no one can actually know? Since not all rules are posted.
  • To qualify as being poor enough to receive social assistance one must declare that one has at least some money.
  • To get food from a food bank there are sometimes application forms to be completed. What if the recipient is illiterate? Perhaps the applicant is also hungry, unemployed and does not speak the local language. Or maybe the person has no phone and / or address? How can this person be expected to complete the necessary form(s)?
  • To qualify for housing assistance, one must have a current address from which one will move.
  • To be considered capable of doing a job one must prove that one has already worked in the same role and has relevant experience. How can one gain the necessary experience if one has not worked in this area of expertise?
  • To be eligible for employment counseling one has to prove that one can find a job and be considered job ready and / or capable of working.
  • To qualify for legal aid one must demonstrate some source of income and / or savings.
  • Schools don’t teach one how to complete a tax return, but one must know how file one’s tax return before one graduates.
  • People are permitted to smoke cigarettes and not simultaneously required to have health insurance.
  • Soda pop and bottled water are more expensive than alcohol / liquor on a cruise ship.
  • To make a telephone call on a cruise ship can cost more than a fancy drink.
  • You can order almost any food for delivery, but not fruit or milk.